Given that this would not be for "public consumption" (i.e., only targeted at the web site developed for the business) would that be a problem? The web developer and I would agree on the spec, and it would only change for a mutually agreed upon design change.
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James H. H. Lampert
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 12:22 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Web-to-i Communications questions
On 1/20/14 9:15 AM, Koester, Michael wrote:
Thanks Dan. I like the SOAP web service idea. I've done projectsEeewww. I've had to consume SOAP; it tasted terrible, and gave me a
where I've consumed web services, but have not yet coded any that
provide. Seems like a fit, though. I'll check into that.
REST is much less strenuous than SOAP. At least in my experience, the
nastiest RESTful web services (e.g., Google Calendar) are still easier
to deal with than the friendliest SOAP ones.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact