ABSOLUTELY agree. SMB is not really good at WAN communications.
FTP will almost certainly clobber it in transfer time.
Consider CHGTCPA to larger buffer sizes too for the longer distance
- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
On 10/8/2013 10:29 AM, TheBorg wrote:
(IBM i 7.1)Windows
We are currently testing a file extract process on IBM i which builds a
UTF-8 text file in the IFS and uses the CPY command to copy the file to a
folder on a Windows server via QNTC.
(The Power system where the data resides is located in Europe. The
Server is in the United States...)times.
The text file contains 6 million rows, file size is 3.5 gb, and the CPY
takes around 14 hours to complete.
One of the consultants has suggested using FTP instead of CPY to move the
data. His claim is that the SMB protocol used by QNTC has much more
overhead than FTP.
We have not tested the transfer using FTP yet to compare the transfer
Anybody have knowledge/experience to support or refute this claim?
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact