×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:21 PM, James H. H. Lampert
<jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So maybe in this case, the solution that's so annoying in WRKLNK
wouldn't be so annoying here.
In your original question, you said the names would "usually" fit
easily on a line and only "theoretically" be up to 128. If it's only
rarely going to not fit, do the simplest thing (which sounds like the
WRKLNK-style solution). If it's going to be longer than one line
"kind of too often", especially if they are likely to happen in clumps
(where the first 70+ characters is not enough to distinguish between
several adjacent names) then I would try your
two-subfile-records-as-needed idea.
John
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
