I won't answer "should", but we have it in our library list regardless of test/prod/whatever. It's below our application libraries, to make sure we have the correct test/prod/whatever objects first.
From:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of A Paul [amandapaul1@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 19:23
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Just looking for some opinion here whether QGPL should be part of the user library list(for test environment), I believe it can invalidate tests and can have other impacts.
I know IBM created QGPL to contain some objects that are necessary for the system to perform effectively.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact