MIDRANGE-L » February 2013

Re: Getting job tables back to 163520

Subject: Re: Getting job tables back to 163520
From: Mark S Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:35:26 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Jack:

What system value(s) are you talking about? And where did this number 163520 come from?

Mark S. Waterbury

> On 2/5/2013 7:20 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:

Would this require a manual IPL, prior doing a chgipla to compress the job
tables, then aftewards change the system value back to 163520.

This thread ...

Getting job tables back to 163520 , Jack Kingsley

Re: Getting job tables back to 163520, Mark S Waterbury <=
- Re: Getting job tables back to 163520 , DrFranken

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Getting job tables back to 163520 , DrFranken

References:
- Getting job tables back to 163520 , Jack Kingsley

Prev by Author: Re: new power7+ models, # of threads
Next by Author: Re: How to best identify if applications are running in OPM mode?
Previous by thread: Getting job tables back to 163520
Next by thread: Re: Getting job tables back to 163520
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact