Then I think your after the PowerHA that uses SAN storage and relies on
that to replicate the data, and allows for two systems you can switch
back and forth with. The SAN and Global Mirroring are the pricey
parts, but if you need them, worth it.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 1/31/2013 1:23 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
SAN to SAN replication without the need for IASP if at all possible. I
need localized HA with remote side continuous. I don't mind IASP but was
trying to see where the comparisons go as well as the price.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Oberholtzer<
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What are you trying to accomplish? One provides for a separate system
> and storage, the other common storage (that is replicated by the storage
> manager) and separate systems. One's aimed at High Availability ones
> aimed at Continuous availability.
>
> PowerHA is cheaper, but has the drawback of requiring iASPs.
>
> Jim Oberholtzer
> Chief Technical Architect
> Agile Technology Architects
>
>
> On 1/31/2013 12:20 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
> > Has anyone installed this, pros/cons. I have been reading the
> requirements
> > and they seem lengthy as well as pricey. Is there any real significant
> > gains to doing LPM 'vs' POWER-HA. A major requirement for LPM is SAN
> where
> > POWER-HA could be either or from what I am reading.
> > --
> --
