SAN to SAN replication without the need for IASP if at all possible. I
need localized HA with remote side continuous. I don't mind IASP but was
trying to see where the comparisons go as well as the price.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What are you trying to accomplish? One provides for a separate system
and storage, the other common storage (that is replicated by the storage
manager) and separate systems. One's aimed at High Availability ones
aimed at Continuous availability.
PowerHA is cheaper, but has the drawback of requiring iASPs.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 1/31/2013 12:20 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
Has anyone installed this, pros/cons. I have been reading the
requirements
and they seem lengthy as well as pricey. Is there any real significant
gains to doing LPM 'vs' POWER-HA. A major requirement for LPM is SAN
where
POWER-HA could be either or from what I am reading.
--
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
