If the copy is made inside BRMS, the database should be updated to
reflect the contents to the new tape.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 1/24/2013 2:57 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes I have BRMS network set up. How are you thinking that will solve the
issue?
Rob Berendt
-- IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept
1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: Jim
Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems
Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 01/24/2013 03:52
PM Subject: Re: BRMS DUPMEDBRM ? Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx Rob, Do you have BRMS Network set up
(Extra cost LPP) ? That should eliminate your issue with WRKOBJBRM.
Jim Oberholtzer Chief Technical Architect Agile Technology Architects
On 1/24/13 2:33 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes. On my wish list is to be able to ftp that to another site and dup
to
> physical tape. I can do that but it loses track of WRKOBJBRM. IOW, if
I
> run WRKOBJBRM on the source system it doesn't know that a save of that
> object exists on physical tape volume BR0022; only that it exists on
> VRT001.
>
>
> Rob Berendt
> -- IBM Certified System Administrator
