Re: BRMS DUPMEDBRM ?

[Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If the copy is made inside BRMS, the database should be updated to 
reflect the contents to the new tape.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 1/24/2013 2:57 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes I have BRMS network set up.  How are you thinking that will solve the
> issue?
>
>
> Rob Berendt
> -- IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 
> 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108 
> 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: Jim 
> Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems 
> Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 01/24/2013 03:52 
> PM Subject: Re: BRMS DUPMEDBRM ? Sent by: 
> midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx Rob, Do you have BRMS Network set up 
> (Extra cost LPP) ? That should eliminate your issue with WRKOBJBRM. 
> Jim Oberholtzer Chief Technical Architect Agile Technology Architects 
> On 1/24/13 2:33 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >  Yes.  On my wish list is to be able to ftp that to another site and dup
> to
> > >  physical tape.  I can do that but it loses track of WRKOBJBRM.  IOW, if
> I
> > >  run WRKOBJBRM on the source system it doesn't know that a save of that
> > >  object exists on physical tape volume BR0022; only that it exists on
> > >  VRT001.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Rob Berendt
> > >  -- IBM Certified System Administrator