MIDRANGE-L » January 2013

RE: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !

Subject: RE: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !
From: "Paul Nelson" <nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:29 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Best post of the day.

:-))

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:50 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question,was Re: CPI3229:
Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !

Heck, go to COMMON some time and you'll start calling BRMS "Backup and
Recovery according to Miss Saugen".

Rob Berendt

This thread ...

Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !, (continued)
- RE: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , Pete Massiello - ML

References:
- CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , DrFranken
- Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , James H. H. Lampert
- Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , Jim Oberholtzer
- To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , James H. H. Lampert
- Re: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , Jim Oberholtzer
- Re: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB ! , rob

Prev by Author: RE: PWRDWNSYS in CL program
Next by Author: RE: COMMON Virtual Conference
Previous by thread: Re: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !
Next by thread: Re: To BRMS or not to BRMS: That is the Question, was Re: CPI3229: Total length of fields in file> 3.5GB !
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact