Maybe not such a bad idea. Considering the odd places we often had to
wait for IBM to get us a replacement tape drive. And the length of time.
Are you talking just a replacement drive or a whole unit? For example, my
3576 holds 6 drives. Having a whole unit can be a bit expensive. On the
other hand, if you don't use a spare drive on the shelf are they subject
to stiction or other like ailments?
-- IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: "Graap, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Graap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 11/05/2012 05:11 PM Subject: RE: BRMS and Parallel Backup Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>When we were having tape issues I never did figure out if it was the tapedrives, the cables,
>the IOA's, sunspots, gremlins, etc. After having gone months withoutsuccessfully getting
>through one save without having to call in IBM, we replaced them all.LOL ... Yea... Maybe I need two DR sites then with a full recovery
>Are you going to have backups for all that?
configuration at each !
Hmmmm, Maybe 3 would even be even better.
But seriously, I don't think it's a bad idea to have an extra tape drive
though. You can only do so much ....
By 2nd quarter 2013 my plan is to have PowerHA SystemMirror for IBMi in
place at my DR site. Then my first line of defense will be cutting over to
the mirrored system. Tape restore would become a second line of defense if
the DR server fails.
Reply or Forwarded mail from: Kenneth E Graap
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact