Can you suggest a font that IS scaleable and works on a variety of printers?

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of franz400
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 11:29 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: how to handle smaller font pitch


Depending upon the printers and definitions in use, the system may be
substituting other fonts for the 432.
That can result in unexpected printing.
I don't think 11 cpi would ever mean 11 cpi for the characters and 10 cpi
for the space between text
and data (if I understood you correctly).
This whole section of the Info Center (V6R1) describes the AFP Compatibility

btw- in dds, putting the font keyword at the record format should be the
font for all printing in the format.
I would suggest trying the courier fonts 75 and 416 (no pointsize)

Jim Franz

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stone, Joel" <Joel.Stone@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 11:27 AM
Subject: how to handle smaller font pitch

I have an AFPDS external print file described in DDS.

Here is the RLU display:

Date Order Completed:XXXXXXXXXX
Time In............:XXXXXXXX
Time Out...........:XXXXXXXX

The report looks great in 10 CPI as shown below:

Date Order Completed: 10/19/2012
Time In.............: 15:56:00
Time Out............: 16:56:00

But I need to squish stuff smaller. So I changed pitch from 10cpi to
11cpi at the record level: FONT(432 (*POINTSIZE 11)) .

Now there are several spaces between DDS described fields at print time:

Date Order Completed: 10/19/2012
Time In.............: 15:56:00
Time Out............: 16:56:00

|--------------why are there extra spaces here and
how can I remove them?

I am thinking when I use the FONT(432 (*POINTSIZE 11)), the font is
reduced properly. But the mapping of FIELDS is still using 10 cpi to
place the NEXT field, resulting in too much space between fields.

Is there a DDS keyword to use 11 CPI for field placement (as opposed to
font size)?

I can CRTPRTF with


And then fields DO map out using 11 cpi.

Is there a way to do this with DDS keywords - instead of CRTPRTF options?
(So no one has to remember to key in FONT sizes when creating print file).


This outbound email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
Skyscan service.
For more information please visit
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact