Re: Hanging pending commits -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Hanging pending commits
From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:30:30 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Rob

You're now beyond what I know. I had found that ENDCMTCTL removed a *DFTACTGRP definition I'd seen when using CRTQMQRY - IBM sometimes - maybe always - creates a commitment definition but doesn't remove it afterwards.

Sorry it didn't take care of the BRMS one.

Vern

On 9/20/2012 8:41 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

dspjob option(*cmtctl)
Commitment
Definition Text
Q1ABRMS Activation-group-level

ENDCMTCTL
Commitment definition not found.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Hanging pending commits , Jeff Young

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.