Any idea what order the original program used?
Otherwise, the order looks OK to me. It isn't as sensitive as the
server jobs are as far as order of start.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Gary Thompson <gthompson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was just asked to check our modified startup program (late Friday, is there no justice?).
So, I'm definitely not the best fit for this, but here is my question:
Is there any recommended order for starting subsystems?
The startup pgm being replaced did the following as it's first four:
Any hints, comments, or pokes welcomed...
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives