SQL stats question -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: SQL stats question
From: Mike Cunningham <mike.cunningham@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:57:20 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We have an application making ODBC requests to DB2 on i. Work with Active Jobs shows some of these requests with no, or very low AuxIO numbers but very high CPU % use. In same examples showing 60-70 in the AuxIO column and 25-30% in CPU use. We only these kinds of numbers coming from one of many applications doing SQL work. Does anyone have any ideas on what would make an SQL command become CPU bound?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: SQL stats question , Jack Kingsley
RE: SQL stats question , Monnier, Gary

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.