× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Actually at 7.1 you can now limit processor use at the subsystems
using a Workload Group. The capability is limited to how many cores a
job/subsystem can utilise. See this Developer Works article for more
information:

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home?lang=en#/wiki/IBM%20i%20Technology%20Updates/page/IBM%20i%20workload%20groups


On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Jim Oberholtzer
<midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In order:

Processor is not allocated at the subsystem level, rather at the
partition level.  While there are methods to control how much memory is
used by a subsystem and its jobs, there is no way I am aware of (at this
point) to control processor at the subsystem level.

Any subsystem will do, but you have to tune it properly.  I like to set
up routing to push specific workloads into shared memory pools where I
can not control some of the performance.

None of this is hard once you understand the job routing on the system.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.