Re: anyone tried the ifs sav asyncbring?

We're at V6R1. I loaded the PTFs and tried the change with BRMS two weeks
ago (note that this requires the use of a flag set in a data area).

There was no difference in our configuration. While IBM's documentation
indicates that the option will work best in an evenly distributed
directory, ours had a few directories with an extremely large number of
objects (we're on JDE E1, and all of our PDFs/CSVs get put into one
directory per environment). Since we exclude those directories from the
save, I had hoped that the remaining ones would still gain from the
change.

This was with 110,515 objects saved (there are over 500,000 total, but the
remainder were excluded from the save). Under BRMS, our saves write
directly to tape, so maybe that was a constraint as well.

It's a pretty painless process to load the PTF's and create the needed
configuration. It was painless to back out, so I'd recommend trying it on
your environment.


Andrew Lopez
Systems Analyst



Phone:  803-714-2037


Email: ALopez@xxxxxxxxxx
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


This message and any attachments should be treated as proprietary to the sender
and confidential to the identified recipients and should not be disclosed to or
used by anyone other than the intended recipient unless pre arranged with the
sender. If you are not an addressee of this communication, have received this
e-mail by transmission error of the sender, recipient or due to another
originator by an error in transmission, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, use, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is prohibited. In any such event, please
notify the sender immediately by contacting Spirax Sarco Inc., 803 714 2000 or
reply to this e-mail and then delete it from your system. Spirax Sarco Inc.
accepts no responsibility for software viruses and all recipients should check
for viruses before opening any attachments.