× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2012

Re: Re: Virtual tape optimal image catalog entry size(s).

Well one thing I was wondering was, if I had the space set to 10GB and I
save 22GB to it will it just grow to accommodate it? I am guessing not.
So that's why I ran CHGIMGCLGE IMGSIZ(25000) on both entries. It didn't
change the allocated size (yet). Perhaps there's three sizes?
These you see with option 8 of WRKLNK:
1 - Size of object data in bytes . . . . . : 12369
2 - Allocated size of object . . . . . . . : 8662810624
And this you see with WRKIMGCLGE VRTCLG, option 2:
3 - Image size . . . . . . . . . . . IMGSIZ 25000

I am guessing that 2 can increase up to 3. And stays at the largest save
size it has completed until you delete/rebuild it.
I am also guessing that 1 increases up to the amount of data saved on that
tape at this time. It shrinks down on an INZTAP (fact).
1 is the size of the data actually sent in my ftp sessions.



Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.