× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Well then 6.1 it is.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

Copying from Larry's note:

Using NFS Served Image Catalogs for PTFs only requires IBM i 6.1 or newer.

Using NFS Served Image Catalogs for Upgrades requires IBM I 6.1 or newer
*AND POWER6 or newer hardware.

How can this be more clear? IBM i 6.1 has the software technology for NFS
served Image Catalogs and POWER6 has the additional hardware technology for
the IPL portion needed for an upgrade. Is there a different question?

V5R4 does not play. You can no longer order it, and I'll guess (absolutely
no knowledge of IBMs plans) that end of support will be announced soon,
giving a window of another 12 months of support. Then it goes the way of
V5R3, no longer supported.


Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 9/28/2011 6:43 AM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
Is this scenario supported on 5.4 or only on 6.1 and up.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:26 PM, DrFranken<midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

FYI You can do both.

Using NFS Served Image Catalogs for PTFs only requires IBM i 6.1 or
newer.

Using NFS Served Image Catalogs for Upgrades requires IBM I 6.1 or
newer
*AND POWER6 or newer hardware.

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

On 9/27/2011 2:35 PM, Evan Harris wrote:
> You mean IPL-ing from an image catalog on NFS instead of image
> catalogs on local storage ?
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:41 AM,<rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Came this close to using NFS to distribute PTFs between my
various lpars
>> and machines this week. Couldn't quite get it to work so I
opened up a
>> pmr. Turns out that it can't go out over hardware currently in
use.
For
>> example if you are using CMN01 for your regular TCP/IP
communications
>> (let's say line LANLINE) you cannot have LANLINE varied on when
using
it.
>> So you either have to vary the line off (really unpopular when
people
are
>> using it) or use another resource. Apparently virtual lan is
really
>> popular for inter lpar communications and is one solution that
people
are
>> using. IBM admitted that the inability to share a resource is
one big
>> bummer in adoption of this method.
>>
>> Those of you using NFS for this, am I off base here?
>>
>>
>> Rob Berendt
>> --
>> Group Dekko
>> Dept 1600
>> Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
>> Garrett, IN 46738
>> Ship to: Dock 108
>> 6928N 400E
>> Kendallville, IN 46755
>> http://www.dekko.com
>>
--
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.