× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Rob -

On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:04:51 -0400, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Let's take relying upon NAT for example... Let's say you have an internal
address you use of 173.45.161.122. Well, instead of your browser going to
that internal site let's say it mozies on out to the external site with
that IP address. Don't you think your personnel director would be quite
shocked? (If you value your employment I would NOT suggest you try
pointing your browser to it while at work. Trust me, I took an offensive
site, simply pinged it and put that IP address in there.)

I'm confused (nothing new there!).

There are three ranges of addresses specifically allocated for private
networks: 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x, and 172.16.x.x to 172.31.x.x. No
properly configured router should be trying to route those over the
internet.

If someone uses internet-routable IP addresses for their internal
addresses, well, then, they deserve what they get.

Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.