×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Pat,
Probably once the machine is up, it works great. Just takes a while
to get going after an IPL. I have seen lots of these machines in my
travels. You will be amazed how inexpensive 4GB of memory is for that
machine, and what a difference it will make.
We did this on a machine about 2 months ago. Same size with same
number of users. Their screens didn't get much quicker, but they said their
batch jobs just flew through the system afterwards.
Pete
--
Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com
Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093
iTech Solutions because IBM i (AS/400s) didn't come with System
Administrators
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pat Barber
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:02 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Sample Run times for V5R4 to V7R1 Upgrade
Yep...4 drives mirrored with 1gb of memory.
Strangely...the little machine runs just fine with limited resources.
10 users is a big day.
I will recommend some more memory but with that small number
of users, they seem to perk right along with nothing slowing them down.
On 11/23/2010 11:31 AM, Pete Massiello wrote:
That is slower than you would get with Image Catalogues. I would imagine
very small machine with 4 disks and 2GB of memory.
Pete
midrange.com
