× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




170's max out at V5R3
270's max out at V5R4

Power 5's have no max at the moment.

But like a few of the earlier posts, a new single core POWER6 520 is going to smoke any of the above in performance and it's fairly "inexpensive",
comparatively. It's also in the lowest software class, P05.

Bill Epperson Jr.
Systems Communications Analyst
Memorial Health System
(719) 365-8831





Jerry Adams <Jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
02/22/2010 12:58 PM
Subject
RE: Upgrade existing machine or buy new?
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>






Isn't a Model 170 a dead end system? I.e., isn't the highest O/S level it can run V5R3 or R4 (or earlier)? All other things being equal (and they
never are, of course) this would be the tie-breaker that would push me to get a new machine.

Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Rich
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:20 PM
To: midrange-l
Subject: Upgrade existing machine or buy new?

Hi everyone,

I have a customer that has a 9406-170 with 256MB main storage and 25.770GB
disk storage. This system is fine for the 25 or so concurrent users most
of the time. Now we are going to install a web application using Zend.
When we run our web app on that system, it is too slow. The customer is
considering a new System i for this reason. What would be the best use of
their money, buy a new System i or upgrade the RAM and add more disk?

They currently are as near as makes no difference to 100% disk usage. The
daily close and backup is taking about 40 minutes longer than they would
like. They are on v5r3m0. An important software factor when considering
v6 and beyond is that they are heavy users of WRKQRY and that isn't going
to change.

Best suggestions?

James Rich

if you want to understand why that is, there are many good books on
the design of operating systems. please pass them along to redmond
when you're done reading them :)
- Paul Davis on ardour-dev
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.