× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Any generic Virtual Machine that is ported to all possible OS' sucks.
JAVA is a brown liquid that is meant to be consumed, Not to consume all
of your computer resources.

As a employee of a privately owned company, I would not program in JAVA
for any of our systems. I try to stay away from 3rd party applications
that are written generically. Native is always better than VM.

Now if IBM integrates JAVA into the MI layer, that would be a whole new
ball game.

Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:44 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Java performance on the i ? Good? bad? OK?

The proper response is: "Java, in general, sucks. Here's a spatula!"


On 2/4/2010 3:25 PM, Booth Martin wrote:
Java performance on the i ? Good? Bad? OK?

I am being told that "Java on the i sucks." What is the proper
response?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.