× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 1/27/2010 1:39 PM, Mark S. Waterbury wrote:
Hi, Rich:

What QSECURITY< 30 (e.g. 10 or 20) does is, whenever a user profile is
created, the system automatically ensures that it has *ALLOBJ
authority. That's just how this QSECURITY 10 or 20 feature has always
worked, AFAIK.

Once you change to QSECURITY 30 or higher, it is the system
adminstrator's responsibility to go through all of the user profiles and
remove *ALLOBJ from those who should no longer need it. The system
makes no attempt to do this for you.

Hope that helps,

Mark S. Waterbury

> Rich Loeber wrote:
Hello all.

I am working with a client that runs a lot of interactive programs in
S36EE. They are at security level 20 and I'm getting them ready to move
to level 30. I have the user profiles all organized into groups with just
three groups in total. I have the system journal set up to track AF
errors before making the switchover. Earlier this week, I removed all of
the *ALLOBJ permissions for the non-security officer users thinking that
since they are still running level 20, application processing would not be
affected.

Not so .... I've been getting intermittent reports of MCH1001 errors for a
couple of days now. The first round seemed to be satisfied by granting
access to the QS36F library. I just got another one that seems to be
related to a profile not have access to its own *USRPRF object in QSYS.

The question is, why are they having object authority issues when they are
still running at level 20. The whole point of this was to trap any such
errors in advance and get them corrected before making the change from
level 20 to level 30. The IBM documentation recommends this approach.

What am I missing?

Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
[1]http://www.kisco.com

References

Visible links
1. http://www.kisco.com/

I was pretty sure that after setting QSECURITY from 10/20 to 30 or higher the SYSTEM DID remove *ALLOBJ on the nexzt IPL when it actually changes from 10/20 to 30.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.