× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



you do not have to add a primary key constraint to a table if it is
already uniquely keyed. RI constraints are *not* dependent on whether a
"master" file is uniquely keyed or not, just that the key value written to
the "detail" file has a matching key in the "master" file


Thanks,
Tommy Holden



From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/14/2009 03:26 PM
Subject: Re: Constraints, anyone?
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
primary key = unique keyed PF

So why is it available as a constraint, as opposed to simply creating
the PF as keyed? And conversely, assuming the PF is already keyed, is it
necessary to add a primary key constraint to the file in order to use it
in referential constraints?

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.