× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. September 2009

Re: Running with LVLCHK *NO in production

On 4-Sep-09, at 6:03 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

My question is: is there any good reason to use a file in production with
LVLCHK(*NO)? If a level check had happened, this whole fiasco would have
been avoided. I didn't write the software (happily) and I can't think of
any reason why they would have built this file with LVLCHK(*NO).



Not in my book - no.

As your situation aptly demonstrates, when you run with LVLCHK *NO it is like driving the wrong way on the Interstate - it is not a question of IF you have a crash - it is a question of WHEN.

And I don't care how good the control systems are - they are never good enough to make the risk worthwhile.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.