MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » August 2009

Re: Explaining single level store to non i people



fixed

From: Hans Boldt
I suppose my point is that the need for wider pointers is just one of the
disadvantages of single-level store.

You argue that wide pointers add overhead, consume more memory, and negatively impact performance. But Frank Soltis asserts that SLS significantly improves performance in multi-user, multi-tasking settings.

Take the idea of multiple users running the same application, but each instance of the application in a separate process. There may be many jobs running, but never more than one instance of application code and data in memory under SLS, which IIRC greatly reduces the conventional overhead of each process allocating its own space for code and data, and the conventional overhead of switching between jobs.

That may not appeal particularly to those who may be deploying applications under a single J2EE application server. It may not appeal to those who may be deploying applications on one machine and a DBMS on another.

But that REALLY appeals to those of us who use native languages and interfaces that take advantage of that architecture.

-Nathan.









Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact