× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Nathan:

More details about CPW vs. RPR can be found here:

http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=RPR+versus+CPW+ratings+ibm+midrange
or
http://tinyurl.com/m6l2k6

Cheers,

Mark
> Nathan Andelin wrote:
From: Lukas Beeler
CPW, in my opinion, are an almost useless marketing number.
I find CPW to be quite significant in that it offers historical perspective - going back to about 1989 when the first "B" models were built. It seems that these days a lot of benchmarks are redefined after 3-5 years, so you lose historical continuity.
...(snip)...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.