×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 26-Jun-09, at 11:08 AM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Now, these two modules are bound by copy to virtually ALL our
modules. With DSPMOD export and imports I calculate 1491 modules
that import from both these modules. Does that mean that the total
disk space occupied by these modules is around 1491 times the total
of the two modules, ie 2925318144? I think that says nearly 3Gb.
Does that mean I'd gain around 2.8Gb disk space with a service
program?
Or am I just being na?ve as it's quitting time on a Friday?
Yes it does.
But more importantly, it means that when any two of these programs are
in use at the same time (i.e. both active in the stack) you are using
twice the memory _per_user_ - if five programs are in use that is five
times the memory. Multiply that by your number of active users and
you'll see that your memory usage (and therefore disk in terms of
paging storage) are also significantly affected by this practice.
Service programs were invented to avoid the kind of scenario that your
current practice creates. You are wasting significant disk space and
significant memory by binding by copy instead of by reference. And
you gain little or nothing.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
