× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



i just download the images to a network server and use QNTC to map to the
server and do the LODIMGCLG from that share from each of the LPARs, no
moving here, there and everywhere...but that's just me i guess...

Thanks,
Tommy Holden



From:
Jerry Adams <Jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
01/26/2009 10:41 AM
Subject:
RE: Image Catalogue Order
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



After I sent the original question, I remembered attending a session at
COMMON on Systems Management. I recall that the presenter said that the
specific PTF's were sorted before being applied. Don't recall what order,
or if that was even mentioned. In which case, I suppose, the order of the
images doesn't matter, anyway.

I have multiple systems, too. As Rob said in another message, I, too, use
the "Do not connect" and "Order prerequisites for multiple machines". I
just use FTP or Drag-and-Drop (depends upon my mood) to copy the images to
the second system. Since the second system is our production machine, I
put the copy in after hours so that it doesn't cause a drag on production.
But we're a 10 x 5 shop, not a 24 x 7.

Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
William.Epperson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Cc: Midrange-L (midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx); midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Image Catalogue Order


From what I understand, it being a single image catalog allows the
images to be "out of order" and it doesn't matter. I've had the same
issue for the
past 4 ptf installations, and it doesn't seem to matter whether I do the
sort(*yes) or the system sorts it again when it verifies prior to loading.
I have not had any issues with getting my ptf updates to work. Currently
at V5R4 for all my systems, if only there were a way for a "central"
repository without having to ftp the images across to all the servers.
I've even used one system as the master server to install ptf's over. But
that didn't work as well as hoped. It ended up being easier to just drag
the files over using iSeries Navigator to an already created IFS folder
and add the images there without recreating them. I have the same basic
IFS folder in all of my i machines, so I have a text file that I just copy
each line into each machine and add the image. It takes about 5 seconds
per image per server to copy and run the command. For 3 prod server and 3
dev servers, I can load images on all dev boxes in about 15 minutes, the
same thing about a month or two later for my prod boxes. I just paste the
command on eache machine in turn to keep them in order and have 3 term's
open at the same time; it works for me. If you need the commands that I
use, I'll be more than happy to explain it further.

Good luck,
Bill Epperson Jr.
Systems Communications Analyst
Memorial Health System
(719) 365-8831





Jerry Adams <Jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx To
"Midrange-L (midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx)" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
01/26/2009 06:55 AM
Subject
Image
Catalogue Order
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>







I installed the latest Cume for v5r4 on Saturday from an image catalogue.
When I first downloaded the Cume and loaded it, I verified it with the
SORT(*No) option since I had loaded it in the order listed in the PTF
instructions.

The PTF install does its own verify. When I used WRKIMGCLG just a few
minutes ago to unload and remove the images, I noticed that the images
were listed in the following order:
SF99540_10
SF99540_11
SF99540_12
SF99540_1
Etc
SF99540_9

Apparently the PTF install's verify uses SORT(*Yes) option to get the
images in this order. The PTF install completed successfully (or so the
completion log says).

I thought that the order of the images (CD's) mattered. It seems that
this idea was in error. Or is there a potential problem with the order
into which the PTF install process puts the images?

Thanks.


Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.