× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi, Michael:

Use the "result" (contained in &RSLT in my sample program) instead of what the user originally keyed in.

Assuming CVTDAT says it is valid, it will then be in "canonical" format for the format specified, e.g. *ISO,
so it will appear as YYYY-MM-DD instead of YYYY/MM/DD.

Cheers,

Mark S. Waterbury

> Michael Rosinger wrote:
Nick, Mark, et-al,

I tried using CVTDAT and it works for the most part but it let me get away with "YYYY/MM/DD" even though I specified *ISO. When I passed the date into a RUNSQLSTM, it failed because that is not kosher ISO for this schema configuration. I looked at the TOSEP parameter but that only applies to the TO date - not the FROM.

Any ideas?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.