RE: SQL0243 after V5R4 upgrade? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Nope, it's set for read only. Worked find on V5R2.

Bradley V. Stone
BVSTools - www.bvstools.com
eRPG SDK - www.erpgsdk.com

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Wright
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:09 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SQL0243 after V5R4 upgrade?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Bradley V. Stone
<bvstone@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

There's no "sensitive" defined in these.. they're average SQL

statements..

They do a union on two files which is about it.

I am guessing your UNION causes the SQL processor to create a temporary
results table, and SQL is throwing an error because the data used
to create
the temporary table could be stale.

Does the code attempt to update/delete records returned by the Cursor?
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.