× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



When I first saw your question I had to ask myself why you would go thru all this work. When I worked for an AS400 maintenance company I use to have some free time to play around on different systems. I did a performance test and found no performance benefit.

If it were me I would not waste my time.


Jim


--- On Fri, 8/22/08, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance Impact of going from 2 parity drives to 4 parity drives in a 4-disk RAID set
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 2:35 AM
No.

It's already a RAID 5, it will continue to be RAID 5.

Originally, it was a 3-disk RAID 5. Thus parity info was
only on two disks.

We added a 4th disk, but the OS does not automatically
change the
number of disks used for parity data.

If you were to create a 4 disk RAID 5 array from scratch,
parity would
be spread across all 4 disks.

So the question is is it worth the trouble of going into
DST to stop
and restart RAID 5 in order to get the OS to spread the
parity across
all 4 disks instead of just 2 disks.

Charles

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Raul A. Jager W.
<raul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you changing from RAID 1 to RAID 5? RAID 5 usualy
requires at least
3 drives to be usefull.

Charles Wilt wrote:

All,

related to my post about starting/stopping RAID....

The reason for stopping/starting RAID is to spread
out the parity
information from the current 2 drives to all 4
drives in a 4-disk RAID
set.

However, one of the team members on the system
admin team mentioned
that he was told, by IBM, there would be no
noticable performance
impact of moving from 2 parity drive to 4 in a
4-disk RAID set.

Both of us find that surprising.

Does anybody have any first hand expirence to
confim or deny this claim...

Thanks,

Charles Wilt



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the
archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.