×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
InfoCenter is *much* improved. However I am still very partial to
_reference_ manuals where the subject matter warrants. For example,
designing and creating command definition objects and related features
[validity checking & choice programs, etc.], to provide an interface to
a CPP. And I very much dislike the .pdf for manuals, which is all there
is from InfoCenter for manuals; I still prefer BookManager over PDF.
The negative moniker will be hard to let go, regardless of improvements,
even if only because using such monikers makes me grin as I write; like
writing either WinBlows or WinDoze for another function with a long
history of constantly frustrating me :-) So as long as I have better
luck using Google to find what I want in InfoCenter, I will not look on
the InfoCenter fondly.
Regards, Chuck
Dan wrote:
CRPence wrote:
InfoCrap. Need I say more? ;-) <<SNIP>>
I thought I remembered that InfoCenter was vastly improved a few
releases ago. I do remember pining for the old CD-ROMs from the V3
days when InfoCenter first came out. <<SNIP>>
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
