× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Jonathan,

I don't have the answer to your questions, but I will point out that IBM recommends using the *1TB for
all access paths as there are advantages (performance?) other than just being able to have a bigger
access path.

HTH,

Charles Wilt
--
Software Engineer
CINTAS Corporation - IT 92B
513.701.1307

wiltc@xxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Mason
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:34 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: MCH2804 Message and Access Path Size

Hi List

We had a process crash last night with an MCH2804 error message against
a logical file. After checking the lists I found that this was due to
the access path reaching the maximum 4 GB size.

The physical file had 210,598,846 records in it, and the decision was
taken to purge the file rather than change the maximum size to 1
TeraByte. 3-4 hours in to the purge the job was cancelled by an
operator to free up a job queue for overnight processing. The result
was that 7,141,840 records were removed and the access path size was
freed up by 14,680,064 bytes.

Today, however, the same process has crashed and the access path is back
up to 4 GB. Only 90,548 records have been written to the physical.

The key for the access path is 9 bytes, and I was expecting there to be
space for approx 1 million entries (allowing for pointers or suchlike)
in the access path. Does anybody know why there would be significantly
less? By my calculations it looks like each entry in the access path is
taking 162 bytes.

Also, would running a RGZPFM after the purge free up any space in the
access path? The fact it's "PFM" makes me think no, but I'm just
wondering if it removes any allocated space from the access path too.

Any ideas, suggestions, advice or sympathy will be gratefully welcome.

Thanks

Jonathan

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be confidential and privileged. If you receive this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.