× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
So basically I don't see the performance hit when using DDL over DDS. Am I wrong?
No, you're right, Rob, except in one specifc case: a non-UNIQUE keyed physical far outperforms all other keyed approaches, including UNIQUE keys, NON-UNIQUE indexes or even non-UNIQUE logicals. It's a very narrow issue, but then again, for those tables that only have one key, it's enough to make you take a look at it.

Now, given the rule that most files are read rather than written, it's still probably moot, but let's take something like a log file that is only written to and whose primary key is just timestamp; that file might make sense to leave as a DDS keyed physical.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.