× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



<SoapBox>
Agreed. We had a preventative maintenance package that our engineers
selected. GUI. We also had one in house. JDE World. Engineers wanted
the GUI. Why? We need a GUI. What do you need from the GUI? Crickets
chirp. Tumbleweed passes by. We need a GUI. My guess is that for most
users about 80% of the functionality of the GUI is either cut/paste or
sizing of windows. Last time I checked a 5250 emulation session does
that quite well. I know there are good GUI's out there but I'm betting
that most people cut/paste and play with their window size.
</SoapBox>

Michael Crump

Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f

Consulting
If you are not part of the solution, there's good money to be made in
prolonging the problem.
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If it did, it would be
folded, mutilated, watered down, politically corrected, and would show
up a week later if at all. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them,
nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of PaulMmn
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 11:18 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Cc: James.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: HR/Payroll Systems

<Soapbox>
Why do The Users assume that an application with a GUI and a mouse is
better than a green-screen application? Salesmanship! And, perhaps,
poor green-screen design. A properly constructed green-screen
application is much faster for pure data entry than a GUI. Maybe
it's because the system only needs to ship about 2K (that's 2000)
bytes of data down the line to refresh the screen!
</Soapbox>

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


At 9:17 AM -0500 1/2/08, James.Hawkins@xxxxxxxxxx wrote (in part):
A company that I used to work for went through a couple of iterations
of
trying to get away from the payroll/HR package that we were using.
The second attempt, HR says, "We don't like the DOS (green screens)
system, we want a GUI system" after reviewing a few GUI systems "Why
do
they take so much mouse work, I don't want to use a mouse all the time
for
data entry". Go figure.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.