× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Don,

2 ways -

1st - I use the UDF function iDate (by Alan Campin available free at
www.think400.dk/downloads.htm - Thanks Alan!) to tranlate the data field
into a date, then compare with the current date.

when iDate(refdta) = curdate()

Nice clean and easy.

When digits(year(curdate))


On Nov 15, 2007 12:11 PM, Don Cavaiani <dcavaiani@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In System i5 Query (WRKQRY) I do the following:
------------------------------------------------
Result fields:

Today current(date)
Todaychar char(today)
Today2 '20' || substr(todaychar,7,2) || substr(todaychar,1,2 ||
substr(todaychar, 4,2)
Refdta digits(refdt)
-------------------------------------------------
Then:

In Select Test:

refdta LE today2
--------------------------------
How would I do the same in SQL?




-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:27 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SQL Date Math

One last time trial...
Instead of something like
select * from ...
where myNbrDate>CvtDateToNumISO(...)
Try:
select * from ...
where CvtNumISOToDate(myNbrDate)>...
Which will really tell us why you hose up the index by converting the
file data to the input data instead of converting the input data to the
file data.

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Michael Ryan" <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
11/14/2007 08:30 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" < midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
Re: SQL Date Math






That was interesting. Here are the results.

All run in interactive SQL, approximately 56M records. Index built
over the numeric field (which took a freaking long time btw - like 10
minutes).

Using CvtDateToNumISO function with no index - 45 seconds
Using function code with no index - 38 seconds
Using CvtDateToNumISO function with index - 11 seconds
Using function code with index - 2 seconds

On Nov 13, 2007 7:05 PM, Michael Ryan <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes...going from date to numeric. I just named it backwards to throw
off the opposition. :)

Sure...I'll give it a go first thing in the morning, and I'll post my
results back here. I'll also create an index over the numeric field
and see how that helps things.

On Nov 13, 2007 5:28 PM, Elvis Budimlic

<ebudimlic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael,

Do you mean CvtDateToNumISO? Going from DATE to NUMERIC, not the
other way
around.

If so, do you mind running another test?

Take Charles' code out of the UDF and put it in the SQL statement
itself.
Then run it.
I'm curious to see if UDF call itself contributes any significant
overhead.

BTW, do you have an index over the numeric(8,0) field?
If not, I think it would be worth running a test again after you
create one.

Elvis

Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence on IBM i5/OS and
OS/400
http://centerfieldtechnology.com/training.asp


-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: SQL Date Math

Charles' CvtNumtoDateISO function works swell! It takes 120 seconds
for my query (56M records) using the date and substr method, and 39
seconds for the CvtNumToDateISO method. And that's on the
development
system. Much faster on the production system.




--

This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.