× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Most rpg programmers have evolved past the cycle by now; but there are
undoubtedly many old rpg cycle programs still out there which may need
to be maintained, so knowing the cycle could always be helpful.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 3:21 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: RPG Cycle (was: RPG IV Certification)

Sharon,

You can do most of your cycle programs with one line of SQL. You should
stop
comparing the cycle to anything else - it is not a modern language.


Trevor


On 8/20/07 3:16 PM, "Sharon Wintermute" <SWintermute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

You aren't the only teacher around. I have taught classes as well so
I know
better.
As to languages, I know far more than just RPG so don't try to lecture
me.

I can do in 3 lines in the cycle that takes more in non-cycle.

Try sticking to the old saying "if you can't say something nice, don't
say
anything at all."


Sharon


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 2:11 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: RPG Cycle (was: RPG IV Certification)

Sharon,

I used to teach a class called RPG for Performance and
Maintainability. I
always had programmers who were Java or COBOL programmers who would
thank me
for giving a session that they could understand. Some reality, eh?

In this world where a programmer can learn a new language in a few
weeks,
why would we not expect a programmer to understand a program written
in
another language? Most differences between languages boil down to
syntax -
other than the cycle, probably :-) To say that a programmer should be
limited to one language - now you are not in the real world.

And the beauty of the NEW techniques is that they work, they are
easier to
maintain, and improve responsiveness of the IT organization. Who says
a new
technique would require 80 lines of code over 3 for a cycle program?
Using
ILE with the ability to plug in modules, I expect most new programs
are MUCH
shorter than your old RPG - cycle or not.

I started with the cycle - 25 years ago. I maintain programs that use
the
cycle - for most of those 25 years and also in 2007. If you want to
tell me
to shut up, you may want to try another approach.

Trevor



On 8/20/07 3:01 PM, "Sharon Wintermute" <SWintermute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Trevor,

I usually don't respond to this kind of rhetoric, but it is quite
obvious you
do not have a clue what reality is all about.

The idea that a COBOL programmer should be able to maintain RPG is
not valid.
That's like saying a Java programmer can maintain PL/1.

The beauty of some of the old techniques is THAT THEY WORK.

Writing code in 3 lines versus 80 is definitely a plus. This also
reduces
program size, memory requirements, etc. You should use whatever
technique
gives the best result "for that application". Sometimes its cycle,
usually
it
is not.

Since you plainly don't know how or why to use the cycle stay quiet.


Sharon Wintermute

PS. Under 50 and have used the cycle.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of
BillSoft, Incorporated and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and
are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this
e-mail is addressed. If there is a non-disclosure agreement in effect
between BillSoft and the recipient, the contents of this email and any
files transmitted with it should be treated as confidential under the
terms of such agreement. If you are not one of the named recipients
or
otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately
from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination,
forwarding,
printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.

"BillSoft" and "EZTax" are registered trademarks of BillSoft,
Incorporated.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.