× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Doesn't that go in the "it only happens on Friday" bucket??




On 7/20/07 12:52 PM, "Jerry Adams" <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I noticed that, but wasn't going there, Booth. .-)


* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
email
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Booth Martin wrote:
Then you are suggesting that larger size is what makes the difference in
performance?

Kirk Goins wrote:

I think the consideration here is the fact that the cache on the base
raid controller for the CPU is only 40mb. If Joel has one of the newer
high performance controllers, they run around 1.5GB of read and write
cache. This config put almost all the disk on that larger controller and
therefore much better dick performance.



Urbanek, Marty wrote:


Joel,

We had a system like that before one could put the load source on RAID
(actually still running that system). The hw/sw of the last few years
allows us to have the load source on RAIDed drives. I'm not an expert on
the subject, but I think RAID would result in slightly less "wasted"
disk space. However, I think with the setup you have, you've got your
bases covered. We had problems with the mirrored load source before and
recovery was accomplished without incident.

-Marty

------------------------------

date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:50:47 -0400
from: "Harvell, Joel" <jbharvell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject:

I am installing a new 525 system with 18 total drives. 2 drives are in
the system unit, and 16 are in the expansion unit. These are 70 gig
drives. I have set up Raid 5 on the 16 drives in the expansion unit.
I added all the drives to asp 1 and started mirroring. So the 2 drives
in the system unit are mirrored, and the 16 drives in the expansion unit
have Raid 5.

Does any one see any problems with this setup?? I have never had
Mirrored drives before.

Thanks

Joel B. Harvell




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.