× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Good question!

Other LICPGMs measure the peaks of usage, but it would probably be tough to
see that bubble up to the i5/OS level from Domino. Especially with Domino
partitioning, etc.



rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounce To
s@xxxxxxxxxxxx Midrange Systems Technical
Discussion
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
05/14/2007 01:07 cc
PM
Subject
Re: User based pricing for the
Please respond to System i
Midrange Systems
Technical
Discussion
<midrange-l@midra
nge.com>






How does one measure how many concurrent Notes users are hitting it? Honor
system of: assume that all users who can access that system, minus an
average absenteeism, are on the system?

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces+rob=dekko.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
05/14/2007 12:12 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
Re: User based pricing for the System i







When I asked several IBM'ers at Common if the new 515 and 525 pricing
models were fitting current customers well, they said they were receiving
plenty of feedback they they were not. One of them that's pretty far up
the food chain said that they were mulling over a concurrent scheme...
hopefully this holds true and we'll see something official very soon!



"Joe Pluta"
<joepluta@plutabr
others.com> To

Sent by: "'Midrange Systems Technical
midrange-l-bounce Discussion'"
s@xxxxxxxxxxxx <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc


05/14/2007 11:35 Subject

AM User based pricing for the System i



Please respond to
Midrange Systems
Technical
Discussion
<midrange-l@midra
nge.com>







From my ISV manager:
===
Thank you for your input over the past few weeks and at PartnerWorld. We
heard your message loud and clear!

On Friday a decision was made to change the way we count users for the 515
and 525 user base pricing. Instead of charging by "named users" we are
going to change to "concurrent users." This change is effective
immediately!
===

They're having a webcast for ISVs, but it's pretty clear what's up:
user-based pricing for the System i.

Joe

--
(reposted with title)



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.