RE: SAVLICPGM changing QBRMS?

Which is exactly why I said we try not to make such changes to IBM
files. The reorg process has run without any problems for over a year.

Loyd Goodbar
Senior programmer/analyst
BorgWarner
TS Water Valley
662-473-5713
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Al Barsa
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:04
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SAVLICPGM changing QBRMS?


You just can't change a file to REUSEDLT(*YES), because this presumes
that
you know how every program that uses that file works.

A "normal" file, which specifies REUSEDLT(*NO) by default assumes that
record "n+1" was written in chronological order after record "n". With
REUSEDLT(*YES), you cannot assume this.

Where does this get you into trouble? When you have a file where the
logic
of the program presumes that "n+1" was written after "n".

Consequently, I would not make this change. You could suggest the
change
to IBM, but make it their responsibility, not yours.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads

Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com





<lgoodbar@borgwar

ner.com>

Sent by:
To
midrange-l-bounce <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

s@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc



Subject
04/09/2007 09:19 RE: SAVLICPGM changing QBRMS?

AM





Please respond to

Midrange Systems

Technical

Discussion

<midrange-l@midra

nge.com>









Agreed. We run a monthly job to reorganize the QUSRBRM library as its
files collect many deleted records. While we could make those files
REUSEDLT(*YES), as a rule we try not to change IBM-supplied files in
situ.

Loyd Goodbar
Senior programmer/analyst
BorgWarner
TS Water Valley
662-473-5713
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Oberholtzer
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 12:39
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAVLICPGM changing QBRMS?

<snip>

I think I explored that, because the product load libraries most likely
have quite a large amount of user data in them now.

--
Jim Oberholtzer




--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.