Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source
From: Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:59:28 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

So far it sounds like CLP works most of the time, CLLE works all of thetime and performs better? Therefore should I conclude that using CLLEis always desirable?


vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Just compiling as a CLLE will give performance benefits.
-------------- Original message --------------From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Booth Martin wrote:
CLP source vs. CLLE sourceI would like to read a general discussion in this area,so my question is quite general:Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP? OrCLP over CLLE?
The only time I ever used ILE CL was when I needed to makean ILE bound call to a CL procedure.
--
JHHL--

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.