RE: QJOBMSGQMX Setting

I really think it's not a big boost maybe even a performance hit to
increase the max job message queue size from 16 to 64...but in reality
the effect will most likely be almost invisible..(what's a few
milliseconds???) 


Thanks,
Tommy Holden


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DebbieKelemen
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:48 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: **SPAM** RE: QJOBMSGQMX Setting

You guys are talking about QJOBMSGQFL not QJOBMSGQMX.  But thanks for
the
try anyway.

Deb


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Al Barsa
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 11:39 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: QJOBMSGQMX Setting

Unless you are routinely exceeding the size of the job message queue, I
think that this is a fine setting.

However the system value that should be changed in this area is
QJOBMSGQFL.
The IBM supplied default of *NOWRAP is bad news.  I like the setting
*PRTWRAP better.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads

Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com



 

             "DebbieKelemen"

             <DebbieKelemen@ho

             tmail.com>
To 
             Sent by:                  "'Midrange Systems Technical

             midrange-l-bounce         Discussion'"

             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

 
cc 
 

             09/26/2006 12:40
Subject 
             PM                        QJOBMSGQMX Setting

 

 

             Please respond to

             Midrange Systems

                 Technical

                Discussion

             <midrange-l@midra

                 nge.com>

 

 





I was reviewing my system values in preparation for a DR test.  Our
QJOBMSGQMX is currently set to 16.  We are on V5R4.  Does anyone have
any
suggestions on setting this?



Debbie Kelemen

Sr. Programmer/Analyst



(719) 272-2617

email:  <mailto:dkelemen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dkelemen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

web:  <http://www.chefscatalog.com/> www.chefscatalog.com



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.