× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I agree %100 with you, but I sure hate doing PTFs and OS Upgrades compared 
to the same CPW/Memory with a larger raid set.


_____________________
Kirk Goins CCNA
Systems Engineer, Manage Inc.
IBM Certified i5 Solution Sales
IBM Certified iSeries Solutions Expert
IBM Certified Designing IBM e-business Solutions 
Office 503-353-1721 x106 Cell 503-577-9519
kirkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   www.manageinc.com

Email Response Times: 
Same Day Maybe, Next Day Probably



qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
07/11/2006 03:18 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
RE: 4 Disk Raid5 Performance over 3 Disk Raid5 Performance







midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

  9. 4 Disk Raid5 Performance over 3 Disk Raid5 Performance
     (kirkg)

I know from real life that a system with a 3 drive raid5 set performs 
almost as bad as a 2 drive mirrored  set. Now I need some official doc 
that says a 4 drive raid5 set out performs a 3 drive raid5  set.  Anyone 
seen something like this?

Unfortunately, no, I haven't seen actual docs. But for the sake of 
completeness on the concept, I want to add a "lunatic fringe" comment... 
NOT to be confused with any form of "recommendation"!

While a 3-drive RAID5 set may perform far worse than 4 or more drives in a 
set, it _might_ not perform badly enough to ignore as a possibility. We 
moved a couple systems from some old hardware to a couple of the 
partitions on a new box, both partitions with 3-drive RAID5 sets, and both 
are so much blazingly faster than the old that we fail to see what the 
complaints are about.

MAJOR caveat -- our processing is ***NOT*** typical and definitely not 
database bound. But when we run a *FULL build of a significant product, we 
still get a big chunk of AuxIO.

The only point is that _sometimes_ for unusual circumstances, a 3-drive 
set can work well. The sum of performance boosts from various components 
after upgrading to new hardware can be impressive.

Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.