× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



COMMON is a user advocacy group. Whether or not it is successful in that endeavor depends upon whether or not one's own issues are being addressed.


Among other things COMMON has re-instated the Requirements process. Actually, re-invented would be a better description since on the old model one had to attend the conference to enter a requirement. I think that has been removed. In fact, if I heard (and remembered) correctly, even non-COMMON members can enter them.


I attended the Town Hall meeting last week. I got ticked off and left after the 10th person during "open mike" griped out "changing the name." Once was more than enough, plus it was addressed *before* the "open mike". My point here being that this was a great venue to say something useful to Mark Shearer that was mostly wasted.


        * Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
        615.995.7024
fax
        615.995.1201
email
        jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Steve Richter wrote:

Is, should COMMON be a user advocacy group?

from http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh032706-story01.html

"...As I prepare to fly out to Minneapolis to attend yet another
COMMON iSeries user group meeting, I find myself pondering how iSeries
shops could bring their collective weight to bear on IBM to compel it
to behave in ways that the user community desires. Because the iSeries
does not have direct competition, IBM doesn't price and package the
iSeries in a way that many of us believe it ought to so it can compete
against Windows, Linux, and Unix platforms. While IBM has a large
customer advisory council, COMMON, and regional user groups all
feeding in requirements and offering advice to Big Blue on how to
improve the iSeries, that is not the same thing as having the power to
actually compel IBM to change its behavior. ..."

"... Like many people in the OS/400 community, if I have an argument
at all, it is almost never with IBM's Rochester labs, where the OS/400
platform is created and manufactured, but rather with IBM's Somers
offices, where the marketing and sales plans are hatched and where the
pricing and packaging decisions are made. Getting Rochester to listen
is easy, since the techies aim to please. Getting Somers to listen is
hard, since the marketeers aim to make as much money in the shortest
term with the least possible amount effort. They do this because
that's what marketeers at public companies do.  ..."



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.