Re: UPS Attachment to an i5 520

Even though your log says 2 seconds "processing" to apply ptfs, I've noticed
it does add considerable time doing something around that ptf process.
jim

To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: UPS Attachment to an i5 520

> Interestingly, the *FULL IPL seemed to take less time than the *SYS
> IPL the night before.

were you applying any delayed ptf's?
jim franz

Here's the times.  System already ended to restricted condition in both
cases.

The time span is from DSPLOG message "PWRDWNSYS command issued with
parameters specified." to "IPL completed."

*SYS IPL took 15:22
*FULL IPL took 9:09

8 PTFs were applied during the *SYS IPL.  DSPLOG indicates the PTF
processing took 2 seconds.

Percentage wise, that's a big time difference.

--
Jeff Crosby
Dilgard Frozen Foods, Inc.
P.O. Box 13369
Ft. Wayne, IN 46868-3369
260-422-7531

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my
company.  Unless I say so.


--

This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list

To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.