Depending on the environment...if you're in an office environment, PCs
are swell. They're not quite as good in a dusty environment, like where
truck loading doors are open and the howling wind brings in loads of
dirt.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
> From: "Luke Dalton" <ldalton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, January 06, 2006 1:12 pm
> To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> OK. I guess I don't understand that statement either. I'm not trying to be
> deliberately obtuse here, but why is a dumb terminal any cheaper to maintain
> over the long run than a PC?
>
> Let's assume you buy a $400 Dell and load it with WinXP Pro and TN5250. If
> that PC is never connected to the web, you don't need to worry too much
> about viruses, I wouldn't' think so you could probably get by without virus
> protection or if not, load some freeware virus protection on it.
>
> Hard drives will spin for years without replacement. You don't need to buy
> any extra equipment for the PC to communicate with your iSeries, that I'm
> aware of, like you do with the dumb terminal.
>
> I guess I'm just not understanding this argument.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jones, John (US)
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:51 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
>
> It's not the purchase price. It's the price to maintain & administer it
> over it's useful life. A terminal costs very little; a PC costs quite a
> lot.
>
> --
> John A. Jones, CISSP
> Americas Information Security Officer
> Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
> V: +1-630-455-2787 F: +1-312-601-1782
> john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luke Dalton
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:45 AM
> To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
> Subject: RE: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
>
> It's been years since I priced a dumb terminal. Just out of curiosity,
> what do they go for these days? If you can get a good basic PC for under
> $400, I can't imagine why you'd want to spend more than that on a dumb
> terminal.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces+ldalton=turbogorilla-software.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+ldalton=turbogorilla-software.com@xxxxxxxxxxx
> m]
> On Behalf Of Booth Martin
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:41 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
>
> Two factors I have seen that prohibit PCs on the production floor are:
>
> 1) A hostile environment. This includes air quality, temperature
> controls, near-by moving objects from fork lifts to thrown packages, and
> workers with no love for the company or its property.
>
> 2) Lost production while people use the PCs to play games, do personal
> stuff, and spend company time to make a case for an Internet connection
> so they can download porn, music, and surf to e Bay.
>
> Until that changes, I can not see durable and cheap terminals
> disappearing. In fact, I would expect the direction to be toward more
> text-based stuff with bar code readers, RF ID, and all sorts of hand
> held devices.
>
> Chuck Lewis wrote:
> > Joe,
> >
> > No offense to you but my last job was at a very large manufacturing
> company
> > and I am now at a distribution company. In both places there are
> > terminals in heavy use and that is NOT going to be changing anytime
> > soon. There are areas that simply do not need PC's and what it would
> > take to keep one running in those areas if they were needed would be
> > basically cost prohibitive.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:50 PM
> > To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
> > Subject: RE: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
> >
> >
> >>From: Jones, John (US)
> >>
> >>Except that IBM never marketed it as $300K off the price if you don't
> >>want 5250. Instead they said 5250 will cost you $300K. So it is not
> >>a discount for not having 5250; it is a fee for having it.
> >
> >
> > IBM never marketed it in any way. But the fact is that every year
> > processors with the same or greater power were cheaper, sometimes
> > significantly cheaper. It's just that the enterprise machines were
> cheaper
> > by a lesser amount.
> >
> >
> >
> >>The problem is that IBM took something that was built-in and thus
> >>considered by the customer base to be 'free' and made it an option.
> >
> >
> > I personally find this practice reprehensible, but it's become
> > standard in corporate America. Give it away free until they need it
> > and then charge
> for
> > it. At least in this instance IBM has been clearly stating for YEARS
> > that you need to get off the 5250.
> >
> >
> >
> >>An
> >>expensive option. Yes, they lowered the purchase price of the base
> >>server so that it was initially something of a wash, but over time the
>
> >>cost of 5250 has become an increasingly higher percentage of the
> >>overall cost of a system.
> >
> >
> > Actually, that's not quite true. In the initial days when there were
> > many tiers of interactive CPW, the 100% interactive machines were
> > sometimes
> four
> > times the cost of the zero CPW version. Nowadays, there are only two
> > versions: with and without.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Believe me, I like the platform as much as anyone on this list, but it
>
> >>becomes increasingly difficult to sell management on the cost of
> >>upgrades. Things like the charge for Enterprise Edition will kill the
>
> >>iSeries at my shop. It is only a matter of time.
> >
> >
> > You could move to the browser. Do you have source? My product would
> > pay for itself many times over by giving you a nearly identical look
> > and feel
> on
> > a much smaller machine.
> >
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
>
> --
> -----------------------------------
> Booth Martin
> http://martinvt.com
> -----------------------------------
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
> This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have
> received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then
> delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use,
> disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior
> permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
> software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on
> any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or
> damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this
> communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client
> privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive
> similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the
> sender to this effect.
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
