× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I don't think Jon was proposing that green-screen wasn't faster in GUI for data entry.


I agree, however, with his assessment regarding users, especially new users. Regardless of which is better/faster, kids right out of school (any school) turn their noses up at character-based screens when they first see them. CEO's that I have known like to brag about their bloated web sites, not that they can get an order processed in less than a second.


I have, also, spoken with college instructors at COMMON about this kind of thing. Nearly all of them say that, when a prospective student sees the iSeries sign-on panel, they either laugh or just walk away. They view it as "old school."

It (the perception) then is an image issue, not a reality issue. Jon was right, as were Larry and Paul.


        * Jerry C. Adams
*iSeries Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
        615.893.8633x152
fax
        615.995.1201
email
        jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Don wrote:

Larry, Jon,

I think there's been several major names stating in the IBM Tech Conf sessions, JAM's, NEIBMCONF's, etc., (and at COMMON) that 5250 (green screen) keyboard I/O IS MUCH FASTER than a GUI interface. And, it's easy to see why.

Don in DC

At 09:06 AM 1/4/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Jon

Jon Paris wrote:
I'm not a fan of GUI for GUI's sake.  I think there is still a role for a
character based interface but end-users disagree.

The end user PURCHASER disagrees, the end users themselves do NOT always
disagree. My wife currently has the choice of entering data via the web
or the 5250 interface.  She uses the 5250 interface exclusively. In
heads down entry you simply cannot predict with certainty where your
cursor will go on the web and you must switch from your entry form to
the screen over and over. In addition you must often switch from the
keyboard to the rodent and back. Neither of these are effective for best
performance.  On the 5250 if they need to look something up they hit F4,
locate the correct value and hit enter. On the web it's a pull down,
scroll around a while then click. Sure you CAN do that with the keyboard
but you can only use the first letters of entries in the list for
positioning you can't 'search' the list.
Ask any application or tool producer if they can sell a 5250 version of
their product - or if they are still investing in green screen apps.  I
don't think you'll find any.  End users decided long ago that they wanted a
graphical interface.

Graphical interfaces are fantastic for getting things OUT of the system.
Query like logic, graphs, charts, pictures etc. are all wonderful on
this side. It's not so bad for casual entry either especially when
limited options exist as to what to do or limited fields to enter data
in. But for those heavy data entry tasks the web still sucks more than
my shop vac.
Sure some existing customers still want 5250 apps, but they are in the
minority and probably aren't upgrading hardware and still run S/36
code.  So
even if they had threaded 5250 apps (which I really doubt the utility of
anyway) they wouldn't buy/write them anyway.

IF the application is S/36 and still work, great. Should lots of effort
be put into maintaining those apps? Likely not. However in my Irish Took
Box (it's a bucket-O-tools) I don't have just a hammer, I also have vice
grips, screwdrivers, crescent wrenches, tape measure, a level, a punch,
a tin snips, and likely several things I haven't seen in years. Each
gets used where it fits best because not every problem is a nail.
Simply abandoing the 5250 interface because it's not sexy does not make
the application better. There is no harm in keeping that part of the
application when it works better and is more efficient for the user (not
to mention the machine.)

And one other thing, Just who the *&%$ decided it was more efficient for
me to enter MMMMM instead of MI when I'm entering my address on a web
page? I have lived in MI since the doctor first smacked me on the
backside. I can enter MI and don't need a list of 50 states to pick
from. Too bad Minnesota and Missouri and Mississippi we got MI you got
something hard to remember. :-) Our friends to the north have far fewer
than 50 provinces and I bet they get saddled with a drop down too. This
is an example of something 'cool' (the drop-down list) being used when
it simply is NOT more efficient for the user OR bandwidth to the
browser. This is 'normal' web design  think.  Hey, how about we just
enter the ZIP code and let the machine pull City and State from there!
We did this 20 years ago on the green screen!!

- Larry
Jon Paris
Partner400

www.Partner400.com
www.RPGWorld.com

--
Larry Bolhuis                   IBM eServer Certified Systems Expert:
Vice President                    iSeries Technical Solutions V5R3
Arbor Solutions, Inc.             iSeries LPAR Technical Solutions V5R3
1345 Monroe NW Suite 259          iSeries Linux Technical Solutions V5R3
Grand Rapids, MI 49505            iSeries Windows Integration Technical
Solutions V5R3
                               IBM eServer Certified Systems Specialist
(616) 451-2500                    iSeries System Administrator for
OS/400 V5R3
(616) 451-2571 - Fax              AS/400 RPG IV Developer
(616) 260-4746 - Cell             iSeries System Command Operations V5R2

 If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English,
thank a soldier.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.