× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rob,

As far as I understand IBM's Tech Doc No. 19180058, you can back up
Windows NT/2000 areas (Boot, User Data (drives), etc.) using the
/QFPNWSSTG directories.

Of course, as my native language is not english, it may be that my
understanding of the TechDoc is wrong :-)


IBM Tech doc at: 
http://tinyurl.com/99aop

Regards,

Luis Rodriguez

 
> message: 10
> date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:08:07 -0500
> from: rob@xxxxxxxxx
> subject: Re: V4R5 Network server storages
> 
> I am trying to think of what relationship, (if any), there is to a
> *SVRSTG 
> object and the IFS entries.  On a machine that has 9 IXS cards and is 
> running V5R3 I do a WRKOBJ *ALL/*ALL *SVRSTG (with *ALLOBJ authority) and 
> I only see
> Object      Type      Library
> QVNISYS1    *SVRSTG   QNTAP 
> 
> However in /QFPNWSSTG I see an average of three entries per IXS card.
> 
> I'm forgetting my history but perhaps IBM moved from *SVRSTG objects to 
> the IFS?
> 
> Rob Berendt
> -- 
> Group Dekko Services, LLC
> Dept 01.073
> PO Box 2000
> Dock 108
> 6928N 400E
> Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
> 
>--------------------------------------------- 
> "Luis Rodriguez" <luisrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 12/14/2005 09:10 AM
> Please respond to
> Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> To
> "Midrange" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Subject
> V4R5 Network server storages
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been checking a 720 (V4R5) that has a /QFPNWSSTG/G IFS entry with
> no (apparent) data. Nevertheless, a run of the QRYIFSLIB ifs tool shows
> it as having three files: QFPCLTSTG1, QFPCLTSTG2 and QFPCLTSTG3, with
> about 2GB each (a little less for QFPCLTSTG3).
> 
> As far as I remember (and IBM KB confirms) these are related to the
> *SVRSTG spaces created for a Windows Server. My confusion is that the
> sum of the *SVRSTG object sizes, as per the WRKOBJ command, is a lot
> less that the IFS Size.
> 
> Does anyone know why this should be so? 
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
> Luis Rodriguez
> ----------------
>   Luis Rodriguez
> 
----------------
  Luis Rodriguez


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.