RE: Using SAV & RSTCHGOBJ as a method of saving records that

I think the reply thing is a function of your email client. Maybe you
can get a timeshare account on a mainframe to process your email.

I don't know if there's an advantage one way or the other...it would be
an easy program to write, and it's in line with the way I think.
Someone else may think the SAV/RST method is better...and I'm sure
there will be an email shortly indicating that there's a TAA tool to do
that very thing.


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: Using SAV & RSTCHGOBJ as a method of saving records that
> From: "Dave Odom" <Dave.Odom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, November 30, 2005 2:06 pm
> To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Michael,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> >>You might be able to do a SAVCHGOBJ (there is no RSTCHGOBJ) and then
> a
> RSTOBJ, but I would write something using journalling myself. <<
> 
> (BTW, is there an editor or mechanism that will allow me to
> automatically capture a person's reply on here and put into a reply to
> the forum and put in the necessary >> marks or the like?   I'm used 
> something much more sophisticated than the copy and paste I'm doing but
> that was on a mainframe back in the '80s using REXX and XEDIT.)
> 
> On to what you wrote...  I don't mind the idea of going after the
> journaled data, but that seems like a fair amount of programming unless
> something like it is already written and I can get a copy.   What are
> the advantages/disadvantages between the approach I offered and going
> against the journal?   
> 
> Thanks much,
> 
> Dave
> 
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.